Thursday, September 5, 2013

I see it, don't they see it?

Here's the article link where they post at this site that the video they have is the video that the government didn't want you to see regarding the 9-11 cover up. Take a gander here.

Looking at the video, at :08, I can clearly see something that looks like the tail fin of a big jet that disappears from view and if you follow the movement, it fits the impact of the building.

We are assuming that this video is of 9-11 and of flight 77 and the pentagon. On that basis, if you check the video at :08, I see the tail fin.

One reason why I don't care for the kids at Loose Change and all others that say this didn't happen, is simply because I saw it live. I witnessed it. It was sad and horrible. I wish to remind the parents of those little kids that made up the documentary entitled "Loose Change," that as a parent, you failed in educating your children. You did so by never teaching them common sense. You failed and now, these juveniles are piddling their made up story. I've said it before: their documentary is slick and well produced, they should move to Hollywood where they can have a chance at making movies. I haven't heard much about them after Popular Mechanics and Popular Science tore them a new a-hole.

That mysterious plane flying around Washington D.C.? AOC. Airborne Operations Command. The reporter that reported that Building 7 was already down when it had not fallen yet. When have reporters gotten all of their facts straight and how often did the news media have to retract their statements and issue corrections?


Our leadership failed on the fateful day. The simple implication that our government was skilled enough to pull of this operation is simply unfathomable. I work in government, have these kids that claim it was a massive government conspiracy ever worked with or for a government agency?

Why do people yell at the rain? They yell at the rain simply because no one else will listen to them.

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Pacific Line ROW

Nice article on the upcoming plans for the old Pacific Electric Right-Of-Way

CURBED - LOS ANGELES ARTICLE





Sunday, August 11, 2013

We've heard this one before.

As you grow in life, or mature, we learn lessons on many things: buying a car, asking a girl out, a job interview - every day we learn something.

If our good friend is enduring something that you have gone through or at least now about, you would tell 'em, right? This isn't a moral dilemma - you help your buddy if it is at all possible. Just this past week, word arrived that talks have been on for a new agreement with the people of the Philippines on a troop-rotation. Rotation? We already have soldiers fighting in the south of the country (Oh, I mean anti-terrorist training stuff) and the Philippine government is already telling their people that it will be for a short time.

Let me see: China is making noise about the Spratly Islands,
Spratly Islands
has been for a short while now. The Philippines sent a ship that was run ashore to certify their claim to the island chain. Everyone in the area pretty much claims the islands and there is nothing on these islands, nothing.

I do recall a U.N. declaration not too long ago about being able to claim parts of the ocean if your continental shelf extends out to sea and where it does so, your country has exclusive gas rights. This is already causing a big issue in the Arctic: Russia is claiming the north pole due to continental shelf extension . . . Canada also lays claim and the United States simply ignores this convention.

Anyway, there could be a great deal of gas under the Spratly Islands, ergo, everyone wants those specs of dirt floating in the South China Sea. This is also a major reason why the governments of China and Japan are dancing around the Senkaku Islands
Senkaku islands
(China refers to them as the Diaoyu Islands) and the same argument also applies here: continental shelf really comes in to play here and this muddies up the claim for China.

So, what is the big deal with the Spratly's? Well, for one, it is called containment. It seems clear that American Foreign Policy is looking to get back in the game in Asia and their old buddy, their poor-old buddy has a potential claim to untold gas riches and they can't take on the big kid in the neighborhood: China.

As in the movie, "My Bodyguard," The Philippines have called on their old colonial buddy and WWII liberator to help fend off the neighborhood's big kid with another, bigger kid. All for the money, potential money.


More troops rotating into the Philippines? You guessed it: we are going there to support our colonial buddies and our troops are going into harm's way. We've seen this before and while the war on terrorism continues or winds down as some are postulating, we are positioning ourselves for the next engagement. 

Ask the Vietnamese about troops rotating in. Ask Europe about our NATO alliance to fend off the Warsaw Pact. Have no illusion, our troops are going in and will go in for a long, long time. This is just the start. To the people of the Philippines: we are coming to stay for a long time. You may wants us on that wall, you may need us on that wall . . . Can you handle the truth about American troops returning to the Philippines?

Images are borrowed from Wikipedia.

Edited on 8/12/2013 9:44 A.M.

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Still awake . . .

I can't find the sheep so i can't count 'em. Looks like another long, long night.

Where is Cobalt? Been gone for over five weeks. I hope you are well.


Monday, August 5, 2013

Chink

Dictionary.com entry: CHINK

The article is here.

The word is not offensive. This word is not the n-word where that word has no positive meaning whatsoever. "A chink in one's armor" is a phrase that I have used often, in the past. I am very careful in using it today only because people are so freaking sensitive AND stupid. Why stupid? They are not listening to my use of the word, much in the same manner as I am writing about it right now.

In the article, the neighborhood claims that the use of the word "chink" for "Chink's Steaks" is not racist, it is a term of endearment. The article states that the term was given to the owner due to their "almond eyes."

Yeah, dude, that is racist. Was then, is now.

The owner, of all people, has decided to change the name because they realize how people can perceive the name. The owner is actually being sensitive to their . . . wallet. Smart business, actually. Though business is down 10%, people will return if the food and service is good. This is a temporary blip and we will return to norm, unless the people remain stupid AND that is a very real possibility. Look, we are talking about Philadelphia here.

Amazing that those in the neighborhood are pissed because of a name change and they express their anger at such with vandalism. Philadelphia? Check, that is spot on for the city of 'brotherly love.' Why don't they channel their anger at the murder rate, poverty, political or racial strife? Do something good with your anger instead of wanting to keep the status quo . . . oh wait, that is racism in a nutshell.

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Still?

Just noticed on facebook:

http://dcclothesline.com/2013/07/21/hawaii-elections-official-swears-that-no-obama-long-form-birth-certificate-exists/?fb_source=pubv1

Are we still posting this stuff? Talk about living in the past.

In the post, this nobody claims that officials told him . . . who are these officials? Show some cajones and name them! Elections official? I had no idea that a "Election Official" had actions to live birth information? A sworn affidavit? Where is the sworn affidavit? I haven't seen it and where was it submitted and to whom?

Whatever dude.

There are a few people that actually did a little bit of homework on this and these guys are known for doing investigations.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/birthcertificate.asp

It has been said: "If you don't read your history, you are bound to re-live it."

Give it up, it's over and continuing to cry about it changes nothing.

"Facebook Friends"

Maybe I should demand people make decisions more often.

If I ask someone a question, is it really too much to ask for you to ANSWER the question? It seems to be too much to ask as I was removed as a "Facebook Friend."